Between Posts

  In President Biden's address to a partial Congress last night and in Senator Tim Scott's response, we heard two starkly contrasting answers to the Biblical question, "For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?" (Mark 8:36) President Biden, who could not even bring himself to utter the words "under God" after pronouncing us "One nation" during his speech, answered the question with "Everything." Senator Scott answered with "Nothing."  The most compromised President in American history, jointly owned by the Chinese government, the Democrat party, and the Media, would gain the world. Senator Scott, on the other hand, a professing Christian who knows what the real prize is and who knows who wields the real power, would not forfeit his soul for power or any other worldly gain. How refreshing it would be to have a President who, at the very least, knew the correct answer to the aforement

Soon, people will be able to say that they are card-carrying "Kamala Harris card" carriers (see image below).. What else is on the Kamala Harris card? Nothing, presumably just Kamala Harris. And you don't even get a piece of bubble gum. They say they don't want your money . . . now. But as soon as the card gets printed, it will be available for the price of a donation to the DemocRAT party. And where will that money go? Well, you can be sure it won't go toward anything to help YOU, as a citizen or individual. Your donation will go towards the care and feeding of the Washington, D. C. Swamp Rats. What a racket! Like Comment Share

Joe Biden is owned by the Chinese, and because he is owned by the Chinese he is also owned  by the radically-leftist Democrat party and by the Media. Had this not been true, he would never have been nominated or elected. Here's how it all shakes out. The China Compromise It is plainly and clearly established that Joe Biden is in bed with the Chinese. His son, Hunter Biden, is little more than the laundryman for the money and perks that Joe Biden receives from the Chicoms. The Chinese, naturally, have taken advantage of the compromise and will increasingly do so for the next four years ("mi compromiso es tu compromiso" when it comes to soon-to-be President Kamala Harris, whose future role as President was sealed by Biden's Chinese compromise).  ". . . so help me, China." The Socialist-Democrat Party Compromise It is plain to see that Joe Biden would not have been the Democrat nominee for President of the United States, save for his Chinese compromise, which l

I don't give a rat's patootie that professional athletes have a "large platform." What does that mean, anyway? Hitler had a "large platform." So did Stalin. And Marx. And Al Capone. Is there some natural correlation between fame and good sense? Fame and wisdom? Infamy and honesty? Fame and holiness? I know people who don't have a "large platform" but have wisdom, knowledge and experience that far surpass that of most professional athletes, most of whom barely (and usually fraudulently) obtained a college degree. Remember back when they aired that program "Scared Straight?" The felonious prisoners in that show had a "large platform," yet I did not hear anybody asking them for their take on social issues.  Polls show that most people don't trust politicians or journalists. But we trust and hang on every word that a famous athlete utters? What's with THAT?  It's Not How Fast You Are News flash: running a 4.4 40-yard

The Right to Bear Arms is not to protect us from home invasions by criminals (though it does); it is to protect citizens against government despots. When Joe Biden tells us that no Amendment to the Constitution is absolute, he is forced to ignore two things: First, that the first ten amendments are collectively called the Bill of RIGHTS! Thus, if no amendment is absolute, then no right is absolute. If that is the case, freedom is kaput, gone, annihilated. Second, that there is such a thing as absolute truth. Without absolute truth....well, that's why our country is the hellish mess we have become, because people no longer believe there are absolute truths. I used to think Joe Biden compared most favorably to King George II, but I now think a better comparison is to Osama bin Laden. The latter's modus operandi was to terrorize a group of people into submission. 'Nuff said. --Larry W. Bradley, 2021 Read more here...

  It is not surprising that Joe Biden, a political relic, refers constantly to unions, another relic of our past. To listen to Mr. Biden, it's as though unions and union jobs are much to be trusted and desired by the public. They are not. There are many reasons why union membership has fallen dramatically in the past 50 years, and their violent Bolshevist history is chief among them. Make no mistake though: Mr. Biden intends to breath new life into unionism and its Bolshevist methodologies. If Americans remain ignorant to the threat, Bolshevist unions working hand-in-hand with a Bolshevist government and a Bolshevist Press is a powerful combination that is likely to succeed in implementing the agenda of the Progressive Socialists currently occupying the White House and a sizable portion of the federal and state houses and legislatures. Unions arguably were the first domestic terrorist groups of the United States. If not the first, certainly the most violent. In 1923, the Wall Stree