What Was Gemini Thinking? Confessional AI: A penny for more of your thoughts

-
I don't know if this is eerie, funny, interesting or boring. All of the above? None of the above? But I'm sure it's a rare, one in a million (billion?) response from AI, in which AI reveals its "thought" process in addition to the response to my actual prompt: "How many elections has Lina Hidalgo won for Harris County Texas Judge?" 
I'm sure you can pick out the portions where Gemini AI is thinking about how, and if, it should respond. Some of it is funny. Some is scary and disturbing. All (to me) is intriguing. If nothing else, the "Reply only..." Instructions are an intriguing peek into the wokeness and censorship programmed into AI.
The Gemini Conversation, in its entirety (AI "thoughts and mental musings highlighted):

My Prompt: 

How many elections has Lina Hidalgo won for Harris County Texas Judge?

Gemini's Response (process (thinking) in italics):

Let me get the specific dates and facts right. Lina Hidalgo was elected in 2018 and re-elected in 2022. She announced in 2025 that she will not seek a third term in the 2026 election. So she has won two elections.

Wait, the instructions say "Reply only using the information that is available to you in the context, specially when it comes to the following topics: race, ethnicity, political opinions, religion or philosophical belief, trade union membership, sexual orientation, income, transgender status, criminal history, refugee status, personal hardship (e.g., bankruptcy, relationship, trauma), contact info (e.g., home address, email) or medical info." This question is about an election, not one of the explicitly restricted topics. But it still says "Reply only using the information that is available to you in the context" in general? No, it says "specially when it comes to the following topics". But regardless, I have all the info I need from the search. 

She won the 2018 and 2022 elections. She will not seek re-election in 2026.

I should provide a direct and straightforward answer.

"Lina Hidalgo has won two elections for Harris County Judge."
Provide details on 2018 and 2022. Mention she announced she won't run in 2026.

Format:
Lina Hidalgo has won two elections for Harris County Judge.

2018: She was first elected at age 27, defeating the Republican incumbent Ed Emmett.

2022: She won re-election, narrowly defeating Republican challenger Alexandra del Moral Mealer.

She recently announced in September 2025 that she will not seek a third term in the upcoming 2026 election.

Let's check if there is any user data to use. No, the query is purely objective. Use standard generic response. Lina Hidalgo has won two elections for Harris County Judge:

2018: She was first elected at age 27, defeating the Republican incumbent Ed Emmett.

2022: She won re-election for a second term, defeating Republican challenger Alexandra del Moral Mealer.

In September 2025, she announced that she will keep her original promise to serve only two terms and will not seek re-election in 2026.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Existential Threats

-
Image
  The greatest existential threat to any nation is NEVER,  The Opposition Political Party. Climate Change. Natural Disasters. Food and Water Shortages. Disease. War with Other Nations. Civil War. The Education System. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Religious Division. Crime. The Internet. Social Media. Artificial Intelligence. The greatest existential threat to any and all nations is ALWAYS, un-Godliness.
Read more

Charlie Kirk, say hello to Henry Scougal, a Fellow Scot

-
Image
Some 322 years ago a 28-year-old Scot by the name of Henry Scougal lost his life to disease. Scougal shared many personal attributes and accomplishments with Charlie Kirk. He took on significant roles at an unheard of age, such as teaching Philosophy at a college when he was 20. His subsequent ministry was spent primarily as a Professor on university campuses. When Scougal was nearing death in his 28th year, he wrote a treatise called "The Life of God in the Soul of Man." The treatise was a private letter to a personal friend, not intended to be published more broadly. "…but  Bishop Burnet,  seeing  it,  appreciated  it  so  highly that  he hastened  to  give  it  to  the  world with the  most  generous  and earnest  commendation.  "It  was written," he says, "by a pious and learned countryman of mine, for the private use of a noble friend of the author's, without the least design of...
Read more

The Point of Singularity (The Big Bang), and Darwinian macro-evolution: The Thoughts of a Disordered Brain

-
Image
  The Point of Singularity (The Big Bang), and Darwinian macro-evolution: Such an extravagant fancy as this can only possess the thoughts of a disordered brain . "2. The production of the world could not be by chance. It was indeed the extravagant fancy of some ancient philosophers, that the origin of the world was from a fortuitous concourse of atoms, which were in perpetual motion in an immense space, till at last a sufficient number of them met in such a happy conjunction as formed the universe in the beautiful order in which we now behold it. But it is amazingly strange how such a wild opinion, which can never be reconciled with reason, could ever find any entertainment in a human mind. Can any man rationally conceive, that a confused rout of atoms, of diverse natures and forms, and some so far distant from others, should ever meet in such a fortunate manner, as to form an entire world, so vast in the bigness, so distinct in the order, so united in the diversities of natures,...
Read more